Housing Act 1988, s.34(1)(b) – Continuation of statutory protection on subsequent grant between same parties of same property – Whether agreement for future grant capable of taking effect as grant – Human Rights Act 1998, s.3 and European Convention on Human Rights, art.8 – Effect on action for recovery of possession
Truro Diocesan Board of Finance Ltd v Foley
Thorner v Major and ors
Proprietary estoppel – Ingredients necessary to found an equity in cases of disposition on death
See also HL [2009] UKHL 18
St. Pancras & Humanist Housing Association Ltd v Leonard
Adverse possession – Estoppel – Necessary extent of knowledge of rights
RHJ Ltd v FT Patten (Holdings) Ltd and anor
Rights of light – Acquisition by prescription – Prescription Act 1832, s.3 – Criteria requirement for compliance with proviso to s.3
R (Roudham & Larling PC) v Breckland Council
Town and Country Planning – Farm diversification – Development Plan – Adequacy of reasons – Environmental Impact Assessment – Application for judicial review
Persimmon Homes Teesside Ltd v R (Lewis)
Town and Country Planning – Actual or apparent bias or predetermination in decision making – Environmental protection – Special Protection Area – Conservation (Natural Habitats &c) Regulations 1994
Ofulue v Bossert
Adverse possession – Limitation Act 1980, ss.15, 29 & 30 – Acknowledgement of title – Nature and degree of acknowledgement to stop time running
O’Brien and ors v South Cambridgeshire DC
Travellers – Breach of planning control – Town and Country Planning Act 1990, s.187B – Effect of failure to take into account material considerations
McKenny v Foster
Animals Act 1972, s.2 – Strict liability – Characteristic behaviour of species or animal at particular times or in particular circumstances – Need for such behaviour to be known to keeper
Housden v Conservators of Wimbledon and Putney Commons
Prescription Act 1832 – Acquisition of right of way by long user – Wimbledon and Putney Commons Act 1871 – Whether grant of easement by Conservators ultra vires – If not, whether easement by prescription might nevertheless arise
On appeal from HC [2007] EWHC 1171 (Ch)