• McCall & Keenan (PRs of McClean) v Commissioners of HMRC [2009] NICA 12

    Inheritance Tax Act 1984, ss.103(3) & 105(1) & (3) – Business Property Relief – Lettings for agistment – Whether a business – By whom owned – Whether consisting of making or holding of investments
    On appeal from SpC [2008] UKSPC 00678

  • Lloyds TSB Private Banking PLC v Twiddy (Antrobus No.2) DET/47/2004

    Inheritance Tax – Agricultural property relief – Market value versus agriclutural value – Relationship of effect on value of S.115(3) covenant to that of Agricultural Occupancy Condition – Place in the market of ‘lifestyle’ farmers

  • McCall & Keenan (PRs of McClean) v Commissioners of HMRC [2008] UKSPC 00678

    Inheritance Tax Act 1984, ss.103(3) & 105(1) & (3) – Business Property Relief – Lettings for agistment – Whether a business – By whom owned – Whether consisting of making or holding of investments
    See also CA [2009] NICA 12

  • Arnander, Lloyd & Villiers (Exors of McKenna dec’d) v Commissioner of HM Revenue & Customs SPC00565

    Inheritance Tax Act 1984, Ss.115(2) & 117 – Agricultural property relief – Small country estate with main house, other let houses, arable land and farm outbuildings – Whether main house a farmhouse – Whether ‘of a character appropriate to the property’ – Whether occupied for the purposes of agriculture – Whether farm outbuildings occupied for the purposes of agriculture

  • Williams v H.M. Revenue & Customs [2005] UKSPC SPC00500

    Inheritance Tax Act 1984, S.115 – Agricultural property relief – Intensive livestock buildings – Whether occupied with agricultural land or pasture – Requirements for occupation to be ancillary to occupation of agricultural land or pasture

  • Rosser v Inland Revenue [2003] UKSC SPC00368

    INHERITANCE TAX – agricultural property relief – house and barn owned by the deceased – house and barn not agricultural land – property for the purposes of IHTA 1984 s115(2) restricted to agricultural land within the estate of the deceased – house not a farmhouse – barn was of a character appropriate to the property – barn owned and occupied for the relevant period – house not entitled to agricultural relief – barn entitled to agricultural relief – IHTA 1984 s115(2), s116 and s 117

  • Lloyds TSB (Personal Representatives of Antrobus) v Inland Revenue Commissioner [2002] UKSC SPC00336

    IHT – Agricultural Property Relief – Freehold house which was owned and occupied by the deceased – agreed that it was a farmhouse – whether it was of a character appropriate to the property – yes – IHTA 1984 s.115 (2)

  • The Commissioners for her Majesty's Revenue and Customs v The PRs of the Estate of Maureen Vigne (deceased) [2018] UKUT 0357 (TCC)

    Inheritance Tax  – business property relief – s.105 Inheritance Tax Act 1984 – livery business – whether wholly or mainly consisting of the making or holding of investments – whether FTT applied an incorrect test – whether FTT’s conclusion disclosed an error of law – appeal dismissed

  • Viscount Hood (Exor of the Estate of Lady Diana Hood) v The Commissioners of HMRC [2017] UKUT 276 (TCC)

    Inheritance Tax – Deceased granted reversionary sub-lease to sons out of her head leasehold interest – licence to sub-let by head landlord to deceased – whether property disposed of by way of gift was subject to reservation under s.102 FA 1986

  • Commissioners for H.M. Revenue & Customs v Hanson [2013] UKUT 0224 (TCC)

    Agricultural property relief from Inheritance Tax – Farmhouse – Whether nexus between house and land is ownership and occupation or only occupation

  • Brander (PR of Balfour) v HMRC [2010] UKUT 300 (TCC)

    Inheritance Tax Act 1984, ss.104-107 – Business Property Relief – Business in succession to former enterprise – Single business or two separate businesses – Whether a business of making or holding investments – Inheritance tax – Replacement property – Exempt transfers and relief
    – Deceased having liferent interest in family estate – Deceased declared to be fee simple proprietor of the estate
    – Deceased entering into partnership with intended successor – Whether deceaseds interest in partnership, which subsisted immediately before his death, replaced previous business carried on by deceased – Whether business excluded from business property relief as consisting mainly of making or holding investments
    Inheritance Tax 1984, ss 105(1), (3), 107.

  • Atkinson & Smith (PRs of Atkinson) v HMRC [2011] UKUT (TCC)

    Inheritance Tax Act 1984, ss.115(2) & 117(b) – Agricultural property relief – Deceased obliged by ill-health to live off-farm – Whether occupation nevertheless continued to the date of death

  • Commissioners for H.M. Revenue & Customs v Pawson [2013] UKUT 050 (TCC)

    Inheritance Tax Act 1984, Part V, Chapter I – Business property relief – Indicia of business – Business of making or holding investments – Holiday accommodation – Whether activity of operation was sufficient not to be considered ‘investment’.

    On appeal from TC [2012] UKFTT 51

  • William Charnley & Maxwell Hodgkinson (Exors of the late Thomas Gill) v HMRC [2019] UKFTT 650 (TC)

    INHERITANCE TAX – Agricultural property relief – Business property relief – whether dwelling was a farmhouse – nexus between farmhouse and land – agricultural purposes – whether business wholly or mainly consisted of holding investments – appeal allowed

  • Personal Reps of the Estate of Maureen Vigne v HMRC [2017] UKFTT 632 (TC)

    Inheritance Tax – Business Property Relief – Land Use – Livery Yard – Business ‘wholly or mainly’ that of ‘holding investments’

  • Anne Green v HMRC [2015] UKFTT 334 (TC)

    INHERITANCE TAX – whether appeal automatically struck out – whether Appellant should be permitted to give oral evidence – Appellant’s lifetime transfers to a settlement – furnished holiday letting business – whether relevant business property – whether business consisted mainly of the making and/or holding of investments – yes – appeal dismissed

  • Golding v HMRC [2015] UKFTT 334 (TC)

    INHERITANCE TAX –Exempt transfer and relief- Agricultural property relief- farmhouse whether ‘character appropriate’ to 16.29 acres of agricultural land with adjacent agricultural buildings – Yes – farmed by deceased up to the date of his death – Inheritance Tax Act 1984 section 115 (2) relief granted

  • Brander (PR of Balfour) v HMRC [2009] UKFTT 101 (TC)

    Inheritance Tax Act 1984, ss.104-107 – Business Property Relief – Business in succession to former enterprise – Whether a business of making or holding investments

  • Chadda and ors v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 1061 (TC)

    Inheritance Tax – Mutual wills – Nil Rate Band Discretionary Trust – Joint tenancy – Grounds on which severance may be deemed to have taken place – Whether evidence supported an act of severance – Severance by “appropriate mutual conduct”

  • Tunnel Tech Ltd v Reeves [2015] EWCA Civ 718

    Rating – Local Government Finance Act 1988, sch.5 – Market garden – Nursery ground – Whether property from which the produce requires further activity before being capable of public consumption is a “market garden” – Whether buildings in which activity is carried out may be “nursery ground”

  • Simon David Thomas Foster v HMRC [2019] UKUT 251 (LC)

    Tax – Inheritance tax – 6.39 acres of agricultural land – residential development
    potential – window of opportunity during a period of housing land supply shortage – emerging development plan – access and ecological constraints – glut of
    development sites – whether a “bottom up” or “top down” valuation approach
    appropriate – open market value determined at £590,000

  • Wootton v Gill [2015] UKUT 0548 (LC)

    Non-domestic rating – Local Government Finance Act 1988 – Temporary use of retail unit for storage of agricultural machinery and silage – Whether building occupied “together with” agricultural land – Whether building used “solely” in connection with agricultural operations on that other land

  • Eynsham Cricket Club v HMRC [2019] UKUT 286 (TCC)

    VAT – whether construction of cricket pavilion by cricket club zero-rated – whether cricket club a “charity” for VAT purposes – whether pavilion had intended use as a village hall or similarly in providing social or recreational facilities for a local community – whether EU law principles of equal treatment or fiscal neutrality apply

    VATA 1994 Sch 8 Group 5 Item 2 and Note 6 – FA 2010 Sch 6

  • Landlinx Estates Ltd v HMRC [2020] UKFTT 00220 (TC)

    VALUE ADDED TAX – Release of an option to acquire land – Whether an exempt or taxable supply – Group 1 Schedule 9 Value Added Tax Act 1994 – Articles 14 and 135 (1) VAT Directive 2006

  • Scambler & Scambler v Commissioner for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2016] UKFTT 47 (TC)

    Income Tax Act 2007, ss.67 & 68 – Sideways loss relief – ‘Reasonable expectation of profits’ test: s.68(3) – Onus of proof of reasonableness of expectation of no profit – Evidence to be provided by taxpayer

  • Lynch v Revenue and Customs Commissioner [2025] UKFTT 300 (TC)

    Income Tax – Ramsay doctrine and s381 ITTOIA 2005 – profit income or capital – procedural
    validity of discovery assessment – s29(5) TMA test – distinct parts of an insufficiency of tax –
    Human Rights and High Income Child Benefit Charge – Appeal dismissed